There's an argument doing the rounds in the talent industry right now. Whether your agent matters more than the agency they work for is the wrong question. You need both. A great agent inside a great agency. One without the other hits a ceiling.
It maps almost perfectly onto what we see every week with agency founders.
Founders ask us a version of the same question. "Do I need the right person, or do I need the right structure around me?" The answer is the same one the talent industry has been wrestling with for decades. You need both. Independent operators with no infrastructure hit a wall. Founders inside corporate structures without the right people championing them stall. The version that works is strong individual capability with the right collective wrapped around it.
Data puts a number on what getting this wrong costs, the sub £1m cohort has sat at the same confidence score, 66 out of 100, for four years running. Even as margins recovered and gross profit returned to a four-year high. The numbers improved. The feeling didn't. Confidence is a leading indicator, not a trailing one. Lonely operators don't recover it just by hitting better revenue numbers.
This is the problem Unusual Group was built to solve.
The lonely operator problem
Independent agency founders are some of the most capable operators in business. They built something from nothing. They run sales, delivery, finance, and team management on the same Tuesday afternoon. They make calls in real time that would take a corporate board six weeks to approve.
That capability is real. It's also bounded.
A solo operator can only have one conversation at a time. One room. One network. One playbook built from whatever they've personally tested. For the first three to five years, this is usually enough. The founder's individual capability is the engine of growth, and the engine keeps producing.
Then somewhere between £1m and £3m of revenue, the ceiling shows up.
The data is clear on this. 63% of agency owners under £1m say new business is what keeps them up at night. Fewer than 15% have a dedicated salesperson. The maths is brutal. The founder is the sales function, the delivery function, the finance function, and the leadership function simultaneously. New business gets whatever's left over after the other three are handled. Which is usually nothing.
This isn't because the founder got worse at the job. It's because the job got bigger than one person.
The lonely operator hits this ceiling without recognising what they're hitting. They assume they need to work harder. Hire faster. That the market shifted. The actual problem is that the structure around the individual stopped being big enough for what the business needs to do next.
The third way
What the talent industry figured out, eventually, is that the binary was false. The best outcomes happened when great individual operators sat inside great collective structures. The infrastructure amplified the individual. The individual gave the infrastructure something worth amplifying.
Neither was enough alone. Together, they were unstoppable.
The data reinforces this. Healthy agencies run overheads at around 20% of fee income. The cohort average is 27%. That eight-point gap almost always sits in non-billable headcount the billable team has to carry. Exactly the kind of structural drag that disappears when back-office and group-level infrastructure are absorbed elsewhere.
This is the architecture we built Unusual Group around.
We take minority stakes in founder-led agencies. The founder stays in control. The brand stays intact. The culture stays the founder's. What changes is everything around them.
For member agencies, that means access to infrastructure lonely operators can't build alone. Back-office systems that move utilisation from 50% toward the 75 to 85% range where real margin lives. Growth capital to fund the AI-native pivots they couldn't get to from cash flow. Documented playbooks from 150 plus exited agencies, so founders aren't figuring out the path from scratch.
For clients across the collective, it means working with agencies that have specialist depth and the operational firepower of a group ten times their size. The agility of an independent. The capability of a corporate. Without the trade-off either model usually forces.
What this looks like in practice
One of the agencies in our collective joined as a generalist demand gen firm. Good operators. Stuck in a red ocean. Close rates sitting at 10%.
We helped them reposition. They stopped pitching demand gen and started leading with a revenue generation specialist narrative. Specific commercial outcome. Specific B2B buyer. Their close rate went from 10% to 40% inside a year.
This isn't an outlier. Specialist agencies close around 60% of new business deals. Generalists close around 20%. The same data tracks blended rates at £104 average for sub £1m agencies and up to £280 at director level for the top 10%. The repositioning work isn't cosmetic. It moves an agency into an entirely different commercial category.
They didn't change their team. They didn't acquire new skills. What changed was the structure around them. Access to positioning work an independent founder couldn't have done alone, drawing on patterns from across the collective. The founder kept full control. The agency kept its identity. What shifted was what they could see and act on, because they weren't operating alone anymore.
That's the whole thesis. Great individuals plus great collective infrastructure equals outcomes neither produces in isolation.
The Unusual take
The founders who win the next cycle won't be the loneliest operators or the most acquired ones. They'll be the ones who found the third path.
Independent in spirit. Integrated in execution.
The talent industry knew this years ago. The agency industry is catching up. The founders who get there first, who realise they can stay in control while accessing the infrastructure of a much bigger organisation, are the ones building something genuinely valuable. For themselves, for their teams, for their clients, and eventually for whoever buys them.
Your individual capability is your voice. The collective around you turns up the volume.
Neither is enough on its own.
If you've recognised this pattern in your own business, book a call. We'll walk through where you sit against the collective model and what 18 months of working alongside us could look like.


.jpg)

.jpg)